Free Shipping on 1000's of Items

  • DreamWorks making new home at Disney

    By | February 7, 2009

    dreamworks1

    Source: Variety

    DreamWorks is scrambling to find another distribution partner to replace Universal Pictures, which abruptly severed its ties with DreamWorks just four months after hammering out a much-ballyhooed distribution deal with the company.

    The studio had been engaged in talks with DreamWorks for the past two weeks to renegotiate the deal, which was agreed upon in terms but had never been finalized. DreamWorks recently approached Universal to modify the terms of the pact after it became clear that it was having problems raising the money necessary to finance six films a year.

    Universal was willing to make concessions — including investing in the fledgling company — considering how much the global economic climate has changed since the deal was originally struck in October. But the studio balked at DreamWorks’ demands to reduce the distribution fee below 8%, which would have been an unprecedented rate in Hollywood. What Universal didn’t know is that DreamWorks — led by attorney Alan Levine — was also negotiating with Disney to replace Universal as its studio partner moving forward.

    Instead, Universal was blindsided and privately called DreamWorks’ behavior “despicable and deplorable.” Publicly, the studio released a statement that said it “has ended discussions with DreamWorks for a distribution agreement. Over the past several weeks DreamWorks has demanded material changes to previously agreed upon terms. It is clear that DreamWorks’ needs and Universal’s business interests are no longer in alignment. We wish them luck in their pursuit of funding and distribution of their future endeavors.”

    DreamWorks is now close to inking a deal with Disney, which is expected to help the company raise mezzanine funding. Disney, which was an original suitor to land a distribution deal with DreamWorks following DreamWorks’ split with Paramount Pictures, would provide DreamWorks with P&A funds, pay-cable slots and possible production co-financing for DreamWorks’ intended six pictures. So far, DreamWorks has secured a $325 million commitment from Mumbai-based Reliance, which is contingent on DreamWorks raising an additional $325 million in debt via its bankers at J.P. Morgan. Reliance and Spielberg have been splitting the company’s bills, which include development and overhead costs. But DreamWorks’ lack of capital has begun to take a toll on the company. Ben Stiller’s Red Hour shingle exited DreamWorks on Thursday and inked a deal with 20th Century Fox.

    DreamWorks, which declined comment, is hoping to cut a deal with Disney in the next 48 hours. Timing raised eyebrows given that Disney recently severed its ties with Walden Media and the Narnia franchise citing budget concerns.

    While a partnership with Disney would most certainly help DreamWorks, it wouldn’t necessarily make sense for the Mouse House. Since the success of the “Pirates of the Caribbean” franchise, studio has been strictly focused over the past several years on making movies that fit the Disney brand. That means family movies that it can fully exploit across all of its divisions, including theme parks, the Internet, homevid, videogames and merchandising — essentially movies it can capitalize on companywide.

    DreamWorks doesn’t necessarily make those kinds of movies. For example, horror pics like “The Uninvited” and ‘The Ruins,” edgy musicals like Tim Burton’s “Sweeney Todd,” or R-rated comedies like “Tropic Thunder” or “The Heartbreak Kid” would never be greenlit at Disney these days.

    Disney, which declined comment, also has been staying clear of partnering on pics, preferring to keep a monolithic voice in marketing and release date decisions. It’s one reason why the studio is no longer attached to Walden’s “Narnia” franchise. And bringing on board DreamWorks would add more pics to Disney’s release sked, which it had strategically winnowed down to about 14 pics per year. That’s a number that Disney has been happy with: Fewer films enables it to spend more time developing and promoting them upon their release across all of its divisions, making them seem more high-profile, and hopefully earn more at the B.O., as a result.

    Meanwhile, DreamWorks brass feel that Disney is a better fit for its company than Universal, though it is unclear why the company didn’t strike a deal with the Mouse House back in October. As one DreamWorks insider put it, “Steven made the deal with Universal for sentimental reasons,” referring to the studio where the helmer began his career. “But now, he realizes Disney is a better business match.”

    Topics: News | 2 Comments »

    • http://www.freefranchiseinformationblog.com Tom Stanley

      I was on Yahoo and found your blog. Read a few of your other posts. Good work. I am looking forward to reading more from you in the future.

      Tom Stanley

    • Dave

      Thanks Tom, come back often!